Assessment of Microleakage in Class II Cavities having Gingival Wall in Cementum using Three Different Posterior Composites
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Dental composites are one of the most desired restorative materials today. Composite materials can be bonded successfully to human tooth enamel; however, developing the same degree of adhesion to dentin or cementum is a more challenging task. Polymerization contraction stress of dental composites is often associated with marginal and interfacial failures of bonded restorations. The magnitude of stress depends on composite composition and its ability to flow before gelation, which is related to the cavity configuration and curing characteristics of the composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was carried out on 24 extracted human molars and divided into three groups. Class II (slot) cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces of the teeth with the gingival wall in dentin/cementum, and the microleakage was observed. After preparation the teeth were randomly assigned into three groups of eight specimens each. The cavities were restored with: Group 1: Packable composite (Surefil, Dentsply); Group 2: Hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3M Dental Products); Group 3: Nanocomposite (Filtek Z350, 3M Dental Products). Sixteen samples of each group were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling between 5°C and 55°C. All the teeth were immersed in methylene blue for 8 h and then left in tap water for 12 h. The teeth were sectioned mesiodistally with a diamond disc, and examined under a stereomicroscope. RESULTS The analysis indicated that packable composite showed more microleakage than all the other groups. Hybrid composite showed less microleakage than packable composite, but more leakage than nanocomposite. CONCLUSION All composites under the study exhibited a certain amount of microleakage in the dentin/cementum margin. Packable composite showed the most microleakage and nanocomposite showed least microleakage. Since these results were obtained in vitro, long-term clinical trials are needed to fully understand the performance of these materials.
منابع مشابه
Microleakage assessment of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems with the low shrinkage composites
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Different studies evaluating one-step self-etch (SE) adhesive systems show contradictory findings, so the aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of one-step SE adhesive systems and CLEARFIL SE BOND (that serves as the “gold-standard” SE adhesive) with low shrinkage composites. METHODS: In this in vitro study, Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and...
متن کاملبررسی آزمایشگاهی تاثیر کاربرد لاینرهای مختلف در ریزنشت ترمیمهای کامپوزیت خلفی کلاس II
Background and Aims: Packable composites with high viscosity might not adapt properly to internal surfaces and cervical areas. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of class II posterior composite restorations performed using different methods.Materials and Methods: Ninety proximal cavities were prepared in extracted sound premolar teeth, divided into three groups and filled as f...
متن کاملGingival microleakage in class II composite restorations using different flowable composites as liner: an in vitro evaluation
Introduction: One of the main disadvantages of composites is marginal microleakage using flowable composites as a liner beneath composite restorations has been recommended to reduce microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the microleakage of class II restorations with different flowable composites liners. Materials & Methods :45 extracted premolars teeth with class II cavity prepar...
متن کاملIn vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Nanofilled and Flowable Composites in Restoring Class V Cavities in Primary Molars
Article history: Received: 2 Mar 2012 Accepted:13 Apr 2012 Available online: 15 Oct 2012 ZJRMS 2013; 15(1): 47-51 Background: Composite resins undergo microleakage due to polymerization shrinkage particularly when located in cementum or dentin. The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of flowable and nanofilled composites in Class V cavities extending on to the root in primary ...
متن کاملاثر سه روش مختلف ترمیم بر میزان ریزنشت جینجیوالی کامپوزیت با پایه سایلوران در ترمیم های کلاس II
Background and purpose: Microleakage occurs in posterior composite restorations due to polymerization shrinkage. In recent years low shrinkage silorane-based composites have been introduced to reduce microleakage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different restoration techniques on gingival microleakage of a silorane-based composite in class II restorations. Materials ...
متن کامل